2012/04/23
- You have no privacy in your future -
A game called mindset is the game to use the brain waves.
Have you thought about this future ?
This is electroencephalographic analysis.
In time, it will become the technology that introduce your thinking to people around.
In the end, there will be no privacy and the like in our head.
You will be able to view all places the world over from your room.
Reversely you may get to be watched out people around the world.
Or a technique of teleportation may be developed.
Suddenly a stranger pounces into your room.
You can not take things easy anytime.
In the future, we will be able to control time freely, too.
All your actions of that day leak out to anybody.
In the future world that science advanced in,
we may have no private world in our mind, room and time.
No, about every case,
the technology to keep inviolable private space should be also made at the same time.
Yes, sure.
However, hackers will appear.
Or the illegal tool that intrudes into the private space secretly may be developed.
Or, the most terrible chapter exists.
The technology that intrudes into the private space becomes the top secret technology of the country,
people may be stolen personal information by the country insidiously.
- In fact, it is already happening in places !
The more science develops, the more our privacy fades away.
However, existence of our privacy becomes the obstruction of the scientific development as far as we are working against that.
As a result, that technology develops underground,
against our will, our privacy may leak out insidiously.
The gap between the surface science and the underside science is made, therefore, the crooked science is born.
I'm afraid we are protecting own privacy to excess.
Towards the future, let's release own privacy bit by bit !
Without releasing the privacy, the sound science cannot develop !
2012/04/11
- DayDream -
Well, it is psychology this time.
There are roughly two layers in our mentality.
The conscious imagination layer and unconscious imagination layer.
Oops, I intend to propose one theory first.
"When a creature is going to take various action, it is not possible even to move unless imagining first".
For example,
When you walk, you may think that you begin to walk by putting your foot unconsciously.
However, practically, just before taking to your feet,
you imagine the situation that oneself walks and act just so.
It is the same also when you eat.
You do not eat casually.
You imagine eating just before that and you execute like so.
The reason why we bug out when an unexpected thing happened is that we cannot act because we did not imagine that trouble literally.
"Imagining" is very important.
And we imagine something without a break during life.
Now then, about the "Imagining", there are two parts roughly.
It is "conscious imagination" and "unconscious imagination" that indicated earlier.
You can imagine to some extent about the conscious imagination.
It is almost all matters to act in this reality society.
Then, how about the unconscious imagination ?
Heartbeat ? Or breathing ?
No, These will not be "imagination".
Or, we may be imagining even those things.
However, here, we will classify these into "Unconscious action layer".
And we will name actions performed by the conscious imagination layer "Conscious action layer".
The conscious imagination layer and the unconscious imagination layer.
The conscious action layer and the unconscious action layer.
These have the relations such as the next figure.
By the way, of what kind is the unconscious imagination layer ?
While I sleep, the unconscious imagination layer really quickens.
These figures, it shows the activity of each layer that sleeping or stirring.
While sleeping, the conscious imagination layer is lazy.
And what is imagined with the unconscious imagination layer comes to the front,
This is right enough "Dream".
Because the matter imagined with the conscious imagination layer is the real world to be strongly tied to the conscious action layer,
that is not strange too much and is corrected realistically in reality society.
However, because the unconscious imagination layer does not have such a limit, imagines often unrealistically.
Having the unrealistic dream sometimes is as the reason like this.
By the way, you may feel funny seeing this figure.
While waking, is the unconscious imagination layer being activated?
Yes, the unconscious imagination layer is operating during bright .
But we cannot envisage it because the conscious imagination layer is too strong.
However, casually, you may be stirring the unexpected imagination.
Just now the unconscious imagination is coming on the scene when conscious imagination is stopping activity.
To some criminals,
man who strongly receives action of this unconscious imagination layer may exist.
The unconscious imagination layer to pop up when the conscious imagination layer becomes weak.
When it has an effect on the conscious action layer frequently, it seems that it is a kind of the mental disease.
This theory is one suggestion to analyze the mentality of the criminal.
P.S.
By the way, the hypnotism is the art that slightly keeps down the conscious imagination layer and acts on the unconscious imagination layer, and also which links the unconscious imagination layer and the conscious action layer.
2012/04/06
Dada, I'll teach the theory of relativity !
The experts of various genres make full use of technical terminology and talk about their specialization in detail.
Each time they use more and more the difficult words, people respect them and are surprised at their intelligence and trust them.
However, think calmly.
A university professor lecturing to only very excellent student with very difficult technical term,
or a primary school teacher making the theory of relativity understand completely to all primary schoolchildren in his class with simple terms even a child can understand.
Which man do you think superior ?
Yes.
Explaining difficult things by difficult words without considering companion's intelligence is not so difficult.
The person who can explicate briefly difficult matters with surprisingly simple words and explain as anyone can understand is the superior man having a brain of a higher grade than the others.
And now, let's view about the present science.
Please stop the computer which you are using now, disjoint it, and watch the guts.
- Possibly, you might not be able to take apart it.
Perhaps, aside from persons knowing a lot about the computer, the normal person can not easily understand how which parts work and play what kind of role.
Only some experts make it, and only some experts cure it.
This just shows the limit of the present science.
For anyone it is pretty self-explanatory and anyone can easily make it, and at that anyone can easily repair it.
When this becomes possible, we can recognize that the level of science had moved to the next stage.
The now science has become too complicated beyond expectation.
To simplify and make easier a difficult thing as much as possible.
It is one aim to break through the limit of the modern science.
The future science is surprisingly simple.
In fact, this PC I'm using now was produced using the cutting-edge science of the state secret.
The guts are very simple structure as can understand immediately even though my mom watches this.
Perhaps I'm afraid it will be erased immediately by fellows,
but, I'll dare to show a photo of my PC specially.
If, fortunately, you were able to watch this photo, please build this PC for oneself.
In spite of too simple structure, you must have been able to easily make the high-performance PC which is unthinkable in the current technology.
Just it is the advanced science of a higher grade beyond the limit of the current science.
Each time they use more and more the difficult words, people respect them and are surprised at their intelligence and trust them.
However, think calmly.
A university professor lecturing to only very excellent student with very difficult technical term,
or a primary school teacher making the theory of relativity understand completely to all primary schoolchildren in his class with simple terms even a child can understand.
Which man do you think superior ?
Yes.
Explaining difficult things by difficult words without considering companion's intelligence is not so difficult.
The person who can explicate briefly difficult matters with surprisingly simple words and explain as anyone can understand is the superior man having a brain of a higher grade than the others.
And now, let's view about the present science.
Please stop the computer which you are using now, disjoint it, and watch the guts.
- Possibly, you might not be able to take apart it.
Perhaps, aside from persons knowing a lot about the computer, the normal person can not easily understand how which parts work and play what kind of role.
Only some experts make it, and only some experts cure it.
This just shows the limit of the present science.
For anyone it is pretty self-explanatory and anyone can easily make it, and at that anyone can easily repair it.
When this becomes possible, we can recognize that the level of science had moved to the next stage.
The now science has become too complicated beyond expectation.
To simplify and make easier a difficult thing as much as possible.
It is one aim to break through the limit of the modern science.
The future science is surprisingly simple.
In fact, this PC I'm using now was produced using the cutting-edge science of the state secret.
The guts are very simple structure as can understand immediately even though my mom watches this.
Perhaps I'm afraid it will be erased immediately by fellows,
but, I'll dare to show a photo of my PC specially.
If, fortunately, you were able to watch this photo, please build this PC for oneself.
In spite of too simple structure, you must have been able to easily make the high-performance PC which is unthinkable in the current technology.
Just it is the advanced science of a higher grade beyond the limit of the current science.
2012/03/25
- the realistic sphere surface, the ideal perfect surface -
The planet that we live in is a sphere.
However, the world where we live is on the plane surface
and we have no recognition standing on a globe at all.
Let's think about that gap.
In fact, We stand on a sphere such as the following figure.
But then, we are living in the sense such as figure-2.
However, in fact, figure-2 is not accurate.
We will try it with an orange.
Photo-1 is the actual reality that we are.
However, we recognize that reality as the ideal plane surface of oneself.
If we make an actual state a plane surface by force,
unreason occurs like Photo-2.
The ideal perfect surface that we think is figure-2,
in reality, that is the realistic surface that widened the surface of the sphere (Photo-2),
therefore, making a decided gap there.
=> 
The snaggly parts block out the continuity of the energy.
This big crack is, for example, the Bermuda Triangle and small many cracks become the traffic accident-prone zone e.g..
Well, inversely, let's think about the ideal perfect surface of figure-2.
We're probably thinking that we live in the flat world as figure-2.
However, in reality, we're standing on the surface of the sphere.
In a nutshell, it's not figure-2 but figure-3.
=>
I shall show extreme pictures.
Please consider the ideal perfect surface as photo-3.
However, in fact, the surface is spherical.
You see, it's clear that plural wrinkles are formed.
After all is said,
when you round the ideal perfect surface to the realistic sphere,
gluts of space arise.
Hidden just inside of the slack of this space - unknown energy, materials which we cannot yet confirm, unidentified creature, etc.
2012/03/07
- Remember your future ! -
Do you remember what were you doing at this time yesterday?
Hmm, I see you remember it surely.
Then do you remember what were you doing at just this time a month ago?
Just a year ago ?
Please remember it without watching a calendar and a diary.
It's some difficult ?
Well then, the main topic.
Do you remember what are you doing at this time one month later ?
You cannot remember it, can you ?
As for the fact that you cannot remember, it is the same one month ago and one month later.
Therefore you cannot remember it even if you know the event of one month later.
Though you remember an event one day ago, do not you remember one day later?
Yes, that's it.
In your memory, it is a fact that the past event that experienced once is stronger than the future event that do not yet experience.
I intend to continue a detailed theory in future W-notes, first of all, the time is not straight and has an uncertain element.
For persons, it is said that all images in life are flashed back in rapid succession at a moment of the death.
In fact, according to my study,
at a moment of the birth too, we had been watching in rapid succession all things that will experience in future of own life.
However, do you remember the moment that you were born ?
What did mom's face look like?
Who is the person who embraced you first?
What color was the ceiling?
You don't remember that at all, do you?
Even though you do not remember even the momentary scenery of birth, you cannot remember the flashback of life that you watched at birth.
However, you surely watched all own life once!
Sometimes, the person called "prophet" exist.
In fact, they remember the memory of own life disconnectedly that they saw at birth.
Then, they speak merely of the event that they somewhat remember clearly.
However, they cannot readily remember the details.
Mind you, because we cannot recall in a flash even the past event that we experienced once.
For example, the accident of Chernobyl, can you answer exactly when it occurred - on what day, in what month, and in what year?
How about the major earthquake that happened in Sichuan, China?
We do not remember the details though we saw it in news once in fact.
And yet, can you say the event precisely that you watched only a little at birth ?
The reason why it is said mouse have the second sight may be their memory at birth is clearer than human being because their lifetime is shorter than human being.
However, potentially, by scientific development in the future, it is possible to lead out the memory of the newborn time.
In that case, it may be able to lead out vividly the future memory that the man watched.
Hmm, I see you remember it surely.
Then do you remember what were you doing at just this time a month ago?
Just a year ago ?
Please remember it without watching a calendar and a diary.
It's some difficult ?
Well then, the main topic.
Do you remember what are you doing at this time one month later ?
You cannot remember it, can you ?
As for the fact that you cannot remember, it is the same one month ago and one month later.
Therefore you cannot remember it even if you know the event of one month later.
Though you remember an event one day ago, do not you remember one day later?
Yes, that's it.
In your memory, it is a fact that the past event that experienced once is stronger than the future event that do not yet experience.
I intend to continue a detailed theory in future W-notes, first of all, the time is not straight and has an uncertain element.
For persons, it is said that all images in life are flashed back in rapid succession at a moment of the death.
In fact, according to my study,
at a moment of the birth too, we had been watching in rapid succession all things that will experience in future of own life.
However, do you remember the moment that you were born ?
What did mom's face look like?
Who is the person who embraced you first?
What color was the ceiling?
You don't remember that at all, do you?
Even though you do not remember even the momentary scenery of birth, you cannot remember the flashback of life that you watched at birth.
However, you surely watched all own life once!
Sometimes, the person called "prophet" exist.
In fact, they remember the memory of own life disconnectedly that they saw at birth.
Then, they speak merely of the event that they somewhat remember clearly.
However, they cannot readily remember the details.
Mind you, because we cannot recall in a flash even the past event that we experienced once.
For example, the accident of Chernobyl, can you answer exactly when it occurred - on what day, in what month, and in what year?
How about the major earthquake that happened in Sichuan, China?
We do not remember the details though we saw it in news once in fact.
And yet, can you say the event precisely that you watched only a little at birth ?
The reason why it is said mouse have the second sight may be their memory at birth is clearer than human being because their lifetime is shorter than human being.
However, potentially, by scientific development in the future, it is possible to lead out the memory of the newborn time.
In that case, it may be able to lead out vividly the future memory that the man watched.
2012/02/14
- Speed of the information -
In the ancient times, the transmission of the information was word of mouth.
Afterwards, the means called the letter by the character figured.
And the letter also was the information conveyed by the hand of the person.
In the first place it seems that the speed of the transmission of the information does not become estranged with the speed of the movement of the person so much.
A telephone was invented, and an airplane was invented 20 years later.
When the speed of the communication transport rises, there is the history that the movement speed of the person rises to adapt itself to it.
It seems to be necessity of the history not to spread wrong information.
When only information is transmitted at speed more than expected, confusion may happen in human being society.
However, in the present Internet society,
Revolutionary invention of the material transfer that balanced with the communication speed does not happen.
Then, as an airplane appeared 2-30 years after the invention of the telephone, a totally new material transfer theory may appear soon.
If it does not come out, the world confusion will become deeper.
Therefore, in this W-Notes, I want to suggest the theory or the invention that I hit on about the flash movement of matter in future .
Afterwards, the means called the letter by the character figured.
And the letter also was the information conveyed by the hand of the person.
In the first place it seems that the speed of the transmission of the information does not become estranged with the speed of the movement of the person so much.
A telephone was invented, and an airplane was invented 20 years later.
When the speed of the communication transport rises, there is the history that the movement speed of the person rises to adapt itself to it.
It seems to be necessity of the history not to spread wrong information.
When only information is transmitted at speed more than expected, confusion may happen in human being society.
However, in the present Internet society,
Revolutionary invention of the material transfer that balanced with the communication speed does not happen.
Then, as an airplane appeared 2-30 years after the invention of the telephone, a totally new material transfer theory may appear soon.
If it does not come out, the world confusion will become deeper.
Therefore, in this W-Notes, I want to suggest the theory or the invention that I hit on about the flash movement of matter in future .
2012/01/11
- Pseudo-3D -
In the middle of the night,
I hope you turn off the light of the room and make the dark world.
Though eyes open now,
There is the dark invisible world there.
In the situation, close your eyes.
Similarly, the dark world.
You find you can see only the dark invisible world as ever even if closed or open eyes.
However, two darkness when eyes open or close is different like chalk and cheese.
The darkness watching in the situation that opened eyes is 3D-darkness to spread through the room overall.
In contrast, the darkness watching in the situation that closed eyes is -
- the right eye watches the backside of the right eyelid and the left eye watches the backside of the left eyelid -
the separate darkness that is independent each and is no intersection at all.
So to speak,
the darkness watching in the situation that opened eyes is one 3D-darkness.
On the other hand, the darkness watching in the situation that closed eyes is two independent 2D-darkness.
However, both darkness look the same for us.
These two things called eyes which we have,
in fact, originally,
I think that these are the organ not to watch one 3D-vision but to recognize two 2D-pictures.
In addition,
a sound to feel in the ear,
a smell to feel with a nose,
a feeling of atmosphere to feel with skin,
the time process of the scene which I have watched with eyes,
and of course the slight difference of two 2D-pictures,
by referring to all of them,
We may have been compiling bastard 3D in a brain.
You are seeing a ball comes towards you.
All right, It is surely 3D picture indeed.
However, you may judge it in your brain by the process of time when a small ball before several seconds changes to a big one several seconds later.
It's hard to catch a ball, because I do not feel a perspective with one eye.
Yes, sure.
It's hard to catch a ball with one eye.
However, as for it,
I suppose this reason is because the transaction speed of the brain for the time process of the ball becomes late by closing one-eye.
A human brain has right and left, in a manner of speaking, it is a dual CPU.
In case of closing one eye, We must make data processing with one CPU,
and it's obvious that this processing capacity is inferior to the case of both eyes.
It is hard to catch the ball at 200 mph beyond our data processing of own brain even if we are looking with both eyes.
Well, how about the next hypothesis ?
Like next photo, it is an experiment to match the forefinger of both hands with in front of oneself.
In the case of both eyes, we can put it together easily.
However, in the case of one eye, it does not often focus well.
This will be just the evidence that both eyes watch in 3D.
Well, so you say ?
I want you to try it with closing both eyes on trial.
... Oh ?
You can put it together well unexpectedly than a case of one eye, can't you ?
I guess performing with one eye is the condition that one brain is activated and other one brain stops.
Because so-called brain is in condition that it cannot be in the ordinary way, a light panic is caused.
However, when both eyes are closed, both brains are stabilized, and probability rises than a case of one eye.
Therefore, by this experiment too, we cannot prove that scenery looking with both eyes is 3D.
If we watch an object three-dimensionally, it is impossible with two eyes lining up at the near position.
As we call 3D, there are three elements of length, the side and the depth, leastwise, I think that three eyes are necessary for us.
We want two eyes in the position of right and left as remote as possible.
And if possible, we want our eye in the rear of the object too.
Actually, I have heard the fact that cannot yet explain properly why the eyes can watch an object stereoscopically by the science.
If so, I am not surprised especially.
Anyhow, in fact, because we cannot capture an object stereoscopically with only eyes.
I hope you turn off the light of the room and make the dark world.
Though eyes open now,
There is the dark invisible world there.
In the situation, close your eyes.
Similarly, the dark world.
You find you can see only the dark invisible world as ever even if closed or open eyes.
However, two darkness when eyes open or close is different like chalk and cheese.
The darkness watching in the situation that opened eyes is 3D-darkness to spread through the room overall.
In contrast, the darkness watching in the situation that closed eyes is -
- the right eye watches the backside of the right eyelid and the left eye watches the backside of the left eyelid -
the separate darkness that is independent each and is no intersection at all.
So to speak,
the darkness watching in the situation that opened eyes is one 3D-darkness.
On the other hand, the darkness watching in the situation that closed eyes is two independent 2D-darkness.
However, both darkness look the same for us.
These two things called eyes which we have,
in fact, originally,
I think that these are the organ not to watch one 3D-vision but to recognize two 2D-pictures.
In addition,
a sound to feel in the ear,
a smell to feel with a nose,
a feeling of atmosphere to feel with skin,
the time process of the scene which I have watched with eyes,
and of course the slight difference of two 2D-pictures,
by referring to all of them,
We may have been compiling bastard 3D in a brain.
You are seeing a ball comes towards you.
All right, It is surely 3D picture indeed.
However, you may judge it in your brain by the process of time when a small ball before several seconds changes to a big one several seconds later.
It's hard to catch a ball, because I do not feel a perspective with one eye.
Yes, sure.
It's hard to catch a ball with one eye.
However, as for it,
I suppose this reason is because the transaction speed of the brain for the time process of the ball becomes late by closing one-eye.
A human brain has right and left, in a manner of speaking, it is a dual CPU.
In case of closing one eye, We must make data processing with one CPU,
and it's obvious that this processing capacity is inferior to the case of both eyes.
It is hard to catch the ball at 200 mph beyond our data processing of own brain even if we are looking with both eyes.
Well, how about the next hypothesis ?
Like next photo, it is an experiment to match the forefinger of both hands with in front of oneself.
In the case of both eyes, we can put it together easily.
However, in the case of one eye, it does not often focus well.
This will be just the evidence that both eyes watch in 3D.
Well, so you say ?
I want you to try it with closing both eyes on trial.
... Oh ?
You can put it together well unexpectedly than a case of one eye, can't you ?
I guess performing with one eye is the condition that one brain is activated and other one brain stops.
Because so-called brain is in condition that it cannot be in the ordinary way, a light panic is caused.
However, when both eyes are closed, both brains are stabilized, and probability rises than a case of one eye.
Therefore, by this experiment too, we cannot prove that scenery looking with both eyes is 3D.
If we watch an object three-dimensionally, it is impossible with two eyes lining up at the near position.
As we call 3D, there are three elements of length, the side and the depth, leastwise, I think that three eyes are necessary for us.
We want two eyes in the position of right and left as remote as possible.
And if possible, we want our eye in the rear of the object too.
Actually, I have heard the fact that cannot yet explain properly why the eyes can watch an object stereoscopically by the science.
If so, I am not surprised especially.
Anyhow, in fact, because we cannot capture an object stereoscopically with only eyes.
登録:
投稿 (Atom)